Wow. I sorta expected to get lots of emotional responses from this article, and boy did I ever. It seems we've all got a dog in this hunt.
Now, does anyone care to address the finding of the scientific study referred to in this article from a detached point of view?
I don't support it, nor do I reject it, out of hand. If it turns out to be a way to limit the transmission of HIV, great. If the study is wrong, fine; lets move on to the next possibility. But shouldn't it be looked at with an open-mind before out and out rejecting it?
I often stop and ask myself if I'm the Church or Galileo.
__________________
Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.
|