As has been said a thousand times already, the issue here lies in the mother exposing OTHER PEOPLE'S CHILDREN to sex which is a job for the parents of those children. This issue has been dealt with (in our discussion) by Catdaddy33's post.
Also there was some carelessness when dealing with the law which got her in trouble with the fuzz, not that I mind subversion of (the details of) moral laws which don't make any sense outside of a religious context.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by qetwonk'd
Let kids find out about that stuff on their own.
|
This might be a stupid thing to say (heheh) but I think that letting children find out about sex on their own is a very bad idea. My wife and I will teach our daughter about sex and sexuality more formally than allowing her to hear misinformation and outright lies from her friends and aquaintances before she eventually goes out one night and has sex.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ustwo
Bah everyone knows its the dad's job to get his son a hooker for his 16th birthday.
|
I realize there is some irony in your statement but this was the first quote in the thread to make such a statement, others were more serious. Men do not have a monopoly on sexual education. I am speaking more broadly than the topic of this discussion which is the instance sited in the first post. Yes, men have been hiring hookers and strippers for their young sons as a "step into manhood" for centuries but all of these gender barriers are breaking down. Women now have as much right to teach their male children (onoes) about sex as they do to vote.
Morality should be defined by the individual and not by the system in which he resides.