Quote:
Originally Posted by alansmithee
By your definition, fraud, theft, and many other property crimes shouldn't be illegal as well because they dont affect the physicality of anyone.
Seems an exact description of what you're doing.
The same way any other questionable death is investigated.
How did I keep them out of my response? The main of my argument revolves around Roe v Wade.
You are wrong here. I said a local community cannot BAN abortion, which is correct.
What about a state? Is it somehow feasible to eliminate all clinics from a state? Not having an abortion facility on every block does not equal banning abortion.
Because ITS THE COURTS FAULT. The ruling in Roe v Wade put this phantom amendment into the constitiution:
No State or Local Government can make a law banning abortion.
No amount of looking for loopholes will get around that. And local laws cannot be changed to ban abortion, because they would be challenged and deemed unconstitutional (unless there was an overturn of Roe v Wade).
But you haven't shown where the Right does this. In your marijuana example, the court decided on an issue of federalism. There was no extra law added. There was no activism whatsoever.
I'm not saying that they don't, but you haven't shown an example where the Right has used this tactic. And there are many examples of the Left circumventing the constitution to add laws from the bench.
|
This is going nowhere with you. You refuse to quote ALL statements and respond, instead you quote what you want and go off on tangents. It's pointless. We will not agree on this so that's that.
__________________
I just love people who use the excuse "I use/do this because I LOVE the feeling/joy/happiness it brings me" and expect you to be ok with that as you watch them destroy their life blindly following. My response is, "I like to put forks in an eletrical socket, just LOVE that feeling, can't ever get enough of it, so will you let me put this copper fork in that electric socket?"
|