Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Paq
exactly. what is the point of a pharmacist that will not fill prescriptions that pose no physical harm nor have any physical reaction with any other medications. to me, that is a person who only chooses to do half a job..
|
The fraction would actually be much closer to 1 than to 1/2.
And the point would be that fraction.
I'm saying that there wouldn't be a point in a 0, in one who prescribed nothing. That doesn't translate into a 999/1000th pharmacist being pointless.
Perhaps employers who keep on these pharmacists with moral objections disagree with your job description. And employers have the final say in what their employees' jobs entail. Period.
edit: As long as job tasks are not endangering of anyone, of course. Which is actually why I agree on more than one level with the pharmacists in question.