View Single Post
Old 07-06-2005, 03:47 PM   #24 (permalink)
j8ear
Gentlemen Farmer
 
j8ear's Avatar
 
Location: Middle of nowhere, Jersey
Quote:
Originally Posted by pan6467
Yes it does. It allows communities to vote as to whether they will allow abortion in their communities/states. A SC that rules against Roe vs. Wade will in effect make it illegal, period.

You argue federalism, and what you argue is respectable, however, to allow the SC to overturn Roe vs Wade you disallow the states and communities to decide. Thus you are legislating from the bench.

As for Martinguerre's comments, I do agree you do tend to dismiss others and talk down to them in this thread at times. Look at your post (#5) reply to me, to some degree I did feel you were dismissing the argument because I didn't agree or wasn't as "up" on things as you.

But I also realize that you are passionate and that was just your way. You meant no offense.... at least I tend to believe based on other debates and threads where we have met, you have more respect than that.

First of all pan, the post immediately following that should have cleared it up for you. That it didn't is my fault. Again, I don't think you are dim, and I very much enjoy debating, educating and LEARNING from, you.

Second of all, you are one hundred percent catagorically wrong on your understanding of what Roe V Wade did, or what undoing it would mean.

I'm going to try to exlpain it again. Roe V Wade struck down an existing Law (texas I believe) in which a legislature democratically made illegal abortions. The Supreme Court cited a womens rights over her body and to choose. Both noble and worthy, yet similarly outside the bounds of the federal governments jurisdiction. But they used this as a reason to strike this law AND ALL OTHERS like it.

Currently IT IS NOT for local communities to decide, abortion CAN NOT be restricted, at any level, by any legislature, or by any referendum, and this because of the legislating from the bench of the Supreme Court.

Over turning Roe V Wade would RETURN this possiblity to local legislatures, and prevaling thought indicates that possibly and likely ONLY Utah and Guam might do this.

Again, apologies for dissing you...but geez...you really do have this backwards.

-bear
__________________
It's alot easier to ask for forgiveness then it is to ask for permission.
j8ear is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360