View Single Post
Old 07-06-2005, 01:57 PM   #9 (permalink)
oldtimer
Addict
 
Awesome! I'm bewildered! But one element remains askew: The style choice. It seems to have adopted the TFP v4.0 styleset instead of Dark Cloud or Hardwired as originally requested or was it made that way on purpose? Maybe you didn't see that part. Sorry to complicate things.

Also I was wondering whether you knew if the PM XML file saved by TFP also records the folder structure for the sake of organization. I believe it does not but I could be wrong. But if indeed the folder structure is not saved: Inbox, Sent Items & all Custom folders following are not going to be available when reviewing the PMs. If like I suspect, this is TFP's doing, could you write an routine to help TFP's PM archiving system save folder structures into an XML [assuming you know PHP and other associated code and submit that to Hal for implementation] and honor them when viewed by your application? For what I have right now is complete chaos amongst my PMs. On TFP, I had them branched off into folders and that seemed to help tons: Both in location time and next-to-none frustration isolating them for a one-by-one view. I'm sure this would be a worthwhile addition to your application and users archiving PMs on TFP.

Moreso, the URL BBCode doesn't seem to parse and remains plain-text leaving all links unlinkified and untitled, if titled. And in addition to the proposed improvements above, I was going off of the literal meaning of copying the PM area in the User CP, not just the style scheme. To elaborate, not the left column as it is unnecessary but the Folder Controls section shown in the User CP > Private Messages area. That way a automatic dropdown field will be available for all users using your application and load their corresponding folders into that list for quick jump. Then the way the PMs are shown could also be copied: Linkified Title that leads to individual read. I understand though that this could be by design. In that TFP structures the XML so that the PMs and their corresponding titles are shown at the same time. If that is the case, could your application manipulate the XML using some kind of rules to get the kind of view I'm talking about or must the PM archiving utility of TFP's be changed in the way it saves the XML?

That way I'll have a true replica offline environment - organized and easy to read.

Thanks for all your hard work!!!!
oldtimer is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360