Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Seaver
With the exception of Vietnam (due to the pullout), we have accounted for and disarmed all landmines used in battle. So why should we sign the treaty?
|
This is a completely un-based claim.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Seaver
This simply boggles the mind. Everything that kills, when missed, turns bad. How about regular bombs? Heck a missed knife can kill, should we outlaw those too?
|
Please read the next paragraph in my post.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Seaver
This is a war, people are complaining we used weapons that are legal, against legitimate targets firing on American/Iraqi forces, in a time of war. Whats the problem again?
|
The difference is that certain weapons are worse then others. Some having a higher chance to cause civilian casualties then others. Now it's still out to be proven if the MK77s are indeed "that bad". It could be a moot case Seaver, but I am sure you can understand "what the problem"
might be.