Quote:
|
Originally Posted by roachboy
...it amounts to a de facto admission that rove was the source along with an attempt to divert things onto the problematic matter of intent.
|
It does? How so?
Rove was ~a~ source of this Cooper Character. That's it, and this is still unconfirmed. So far. I mean seriously, how many "reporters" can list Rove as a 'source'
We'll see how this plays out.
I don't see anything but emabarrassment for the, "White-House-treasonously-leaked-a-covert-CIA-agents-name-in-retaliation, but-when-reporters-must-reveal-who-leaked, no-crime-was-commited-because-the-CIA-agent-wasn't-covert, yet-rove-needs-to-fry" crowd. Again so far.
I mean really, can you play into Karl's hands any more then that.
It's just amazing.
-bear