|
stevo, the point I'm making is that the US army are so effective that someone in conflict with them would be better off striking soft targets, because they'd be able to inflict a more devestating blow as evidenced in the 9/11 strikes, the French Resistance, Iraqi Insurgency, and other guerilla styles of warfare.
I'm not saying I agree with such tactics, only that they are the only effective means of combat against a technologically and millitarily superior force.
If you wanted to hurt the US, how would you plan your attack?
As for usage of napalm type weapons, unguided bombs and landmines, it is the indiscriminate nature of these weapons that makes their use deplorable, not necessarily the methods they use to inflict casualties on one's opponents.
|