|
I thought this thread was about "napalm-like weapons," not landmines. Plus, the weapons in question were used against military targets, not civillians. So why the fuss?
So you're against landmines that continue to kill children years after a conflict, but you are for attacking civillian targets because it delivers a more effective blow to the enemy?
I don't agree with any of this. esp. the part about terrorism delivering a more effective blow than traditional military nature. If that were true the US ARMY would be full of suicide bombers ready to blow themselves up in mosques and markets. But its not, because it isn't as effective.
__________________
"If I am such a genius why am I drunk, lost in the desert, with a bullet in my ass?" -Otto Mannkusser
|