|
Banned
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ustwo
Yes there is no difference, the CIA broke the law by kidnapping a Al Qaeda and the Al Qaeda broke the law by doing this.
[IMG][/IMG]
There is no difference.
 |
Do we know that "Al Qaeda broke the law by doing this"?
Quote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/1559151.stm
Sunday, 23 September, 2001, 12:30 GMT 13:30 UK
Hijack 'suspects' alive and well
Another of the men named by the FBI as a hijacker in the suicide attacks on Washington and New York has turned up alive and well.
The identities of four of the 19 suspects accused of having carried out the attacks are now in doubt.
|
Quote:
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2001/...in322092.shtml
CBS - Bin Laden Names Hijackers On Tape Dec. 20, 2001
He would identify only three: Nawaq Alhamzi, Salem Alhamzi and Wail Alshehri. Alshehri was on American Airlines flight 11, one of the planes that hit the Twin Towers at the World Trade Center in New York; Alhamzi and Alhamzi were on American Airlines flight 77, which hit the Pentagon.
Bin Laden's "smoking gun" video names living, uninvolved people? This makes no sense!
This is just the beginning, this "confession" video is full of abnormalities.
http://welfarestate.com/wtc/faketape/
|
Quote:
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/...in521223.shtml
CBS - Hijackers Lived With FBI Informant - Sept. 9, 2002
Two of the Sept. 11 hijackers who lived in San Diego in 2000 rented a room from a man who reportedly worked as an undercover FBI informant....the FBI informant prayed with them and even helped one open a bank account.
|
Quote:
http://www.fbi.gov/pressrel/speeches/speech041902.htm
Robert S. Mueller, III, Director, FBI
Commonwealth Club of California
San Francisco, CA
April 19, 2002
..............The hijackers also left no paper trail. In our investigation, we have not uncovered a single piece of paper – either here in the U.S. or in the treasure trove of information that has turned up in Afghanistan and elsewhere – that mentioned any aspect of the September 11th plot. The hijackers had no computers, no laptops, no storage media of any kind. They used hundreds of different pay phones and cell phones, often with prepaid calling cards that are extremely difficult to trace. And they made sure that all the money sent to them to fund their attacks was wired in small amounts to avoid detection...............
|
Quote:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5224036/
..........Contrary to popular understanding, Bin Ladin did not fund al Qaeda through a personal fortune and a network of businesses. Instead, al Qaeda relied primarily on a fundraising network developed over time. Bin Ladin never received a $300 million inheritance..........
|
Quote:
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0505/S00295.htm
........Given this clarification, I now list the omissions and claims of The 9/11 Commission Report that I, in my critique of that report, portrayed as lies:
1. The omission of evidence that at least six of the alleged hijackers---including Waleed al-Shehri, said by the Commission probably to have stabbed a flight attendant on Flight 11 before it crashed into the North Tower of the WTC---are still alive (19-20).
2. The omission of evidence about Mohamed Atta---such as his reported fondness for alcohol, pork, and lap dances---that is in tension with the Commission’s claim that he had become fanatically religious (20-21).
3. The obfuscation of the evidence that Hani Hanjour was too poor a pilot to have flown an airliner into the Pentagon (21-22).
4. The omission of the fact that the publicly released flight manifests contain no Arab names (23). .........
|
Quote:
The FBI still says these are the terrorists. But when they are found alive,
http://www.fbi.gov/pressrel/pressrel01/092701hjpic.htm
U.S. Department of Justice
the FBI says their identity was stolen, and its not the terrorist
Federal Bueau of Investigation - Hijackers
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/1553754.stm
BBC - FBI probes hijackers' identities 9/21/01
# If they stole identities, how did the FBI identify those passengers as terrorists?
Not by flight calls, which contradict the FBI information!
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/1556096.stm
BBC- The last moments of Flight 11
The FBI has named five hijackers on board Flight 11, whereas Ms Sweeney spotted only four. Also, the seat numbers she gave were different from those registered in the hijackers' names.
# These aren't the first mistakes. FBI quickly had amended the original list,
as the original "suicide hijackers" came forward!
http://www.cnn.com/2001/US/09/13/inv...ism/index.html
CNN - FBI: Early probe results show 18 hijackers took part 9/13/01
Based on information from multiple law enforcement sources, CNN reported that Adnan Bukhari and Ameer Bukhari of Vero Beach Florida, were suspected to be two of the pilots who crashed planes into the World Trade Center. CNN later learned that Adnan Bukhari is still in Florida, where he was questioned by the FBI. We are sorry for the misinformation. A federal law enforcement source now tells CNN that Bukhari passed an FBI polygraph and is not considered a suspect. Through his attorney, Bukhari says that he is helping authorities. Ameer Bukhari died in a small plane crash last year.
Some of those involved in the plot left suicide notes, but they are not believed to have been the hijackers, a government source told The Associated Press. It was unclear whether those who left the notes actually killed themselves.
Source =http://www.welfarestate.com/911/
|
Disclaimer: In view of the ongoing disclosure of deception and incompetence practiced by the Bush administration, including intentionally misleading statements made to the American people by the president himself, it is more important than ever for all of us to question everything this government has told us, especially to examine the inconsistancies that they have reported via the press, and directly to us. There are enough inconsistancies surrounding the answers given to us concerning who attacked us on 9/11, to keep an open mind as to what actually happened and who was responsible.
Only later did we find this to call the president's remarks into question:
Quote:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp...¬Found=true
By Bradley Graham
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, April 14, 2004; Page A16
While planning a high-level training exercise months before the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, U.S. military officials considered a scenario in which a hijacked foreign commercial airliner flew into the Pentagon, defense officials said yesterday.
|
Quote:
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washing...18-norad_x.htm
NORAD had drills of jets as weapons
By Steven Komarow and Tom Squitieri, USA TODAY
WASHINGTON — In the two years before the Sept. 11 attacks, the North American Aerospace Defense Command conducted exercises simulating what the White House says was unimaginable at the time: hijacked airliners used as weapons to crash into targets and cause mass casualties.
One of the imagined targets was the World Trade Center...................
|
I am sorry if you read this and take it as an "intrusion". It is time to separate the "shit from the shinola" in the core arguments advanced by some posters that repeat official statments that are, although official, lack credibility or contradict previous statements. |