Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ustwo
Ummm let me get this straight, based even on the report on the left wing independent.
We used firebombs, on military targets, that may be banned under a treaty we didn't sign, and we should be upset by this?
And does anyone honestly think we could get away with using these on a city, when we had reporters, sometimes quite hostile to the marines if you recall, with the marine units? This was during the most closely monitored offensive in modern warfare history.
You can't cover up the effects of a fire bombing on a city, give me a break.
|
Well the current Administration did a hell of a job covering up WMD, so in comparison, a block or two or three of firebombing shouldn't be that difficult. I'm just guessing though, I wasn't there. And napalm-like substances? Could it be somewhat likely that this substance is worse than napalm? We've come along way since Vietnam, baby.
__________________
" In Canada, you can tell the most blatant lie in a calm voice, and people will believe you over someone who's a little passionate about the truth." David Warren, Western Standard.
|