j8ear

I find this line of reasoning warped:

Here's what these four tried to do:

1. Prevent Public use from including private development.
2. Prevent Interstate Commerce from including non-commercial activity , conducted entirely within a single state's border

Here's what the other five did:

1. Included private development as a permissable extension of public use.
2. Included non-commercial activity, conducted entirely within a single states borders as INTERSTATE COMMERCE.

Upholding the principles of the constitution is not legislating from the bench, stretching and bastardizing the constitution to satisfy your ideology is legislating from the bench.

It's really quite simple.

-bear

__________________
It's alot easier to ask for forgiveness then it is to ask for permission.