View Single Post
Old 06-30-2005, 05:34 PM   #30 (permalink)
moosenose
Banned
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fourtyrulz
I don't see how it's impossible to have a petrochemical lifestyle (whatever that really means) without petrochemicals. Car companies are proving us wrong everyday by releasing new hybrid vehicles designed with more fuel efficient parts.

This is hardly the only alternative to a fossil-fuel-free lifestyle. Sure petroleum products like plastics are irreplacable and have lead to amazing progress, but scientific advances in automobile technology leave us with no excuse for why we haven't also advanced as a consumer society.

Police use gun buybacks as an incentive for people to turn in their weapons and get guns off of the streets. If state governments could somehow work with car companies to sponsor car buybacks and trade-ins for people with older, inefficient models we would no doubt see a rise in the use of new hybrid technology. Right now over 10 states already give incentives for hybrid/fuel efficient car drivers: parking fee exemptions, tax deductions, rebates, credits, freeway lane usage, and exemption from emissions checks. If these incentives could be extended to more states with a larger number of incentives we would not be so dependent on petrochemicals.
Gun buybacks? You're using GUN BUYBACKS as proof of your suggestion??? ROTFLMAO!!!

Gun buybacks are PR stunts, nothing more. Have you noticed how rarely they happen nowadays? There's a reason why. It's because gun buybacks do nothing to disarm criminals. I recall one up in Maryland (Baltimore, IIRC), where a guy ended up turning in something like 68 guns himself that he had just bought. He did it because he was able to turn a healthy profit on it.

Gun buybacks are a complete and total joke that do absolutely nothing to take guns away from criminals. I wish they happened more often, because I could use the cash.

We're working to cut back on fossil fuel use. But nobody, and I mean NOBODY, thinks that we can "get away" from using fossil fuels entirely. And even the hybrids do use a lot of fossil fuels in the manufacturing process, et cetera.

The vehicle inspection system is already designed to render older cars too cost-inefficient to remain in service. And Americans LIKE driving big vehicles. You don't have the right to tell them that they can't, either.
moosenose is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360