Quote:
|
Originally Posted by j8ear
They forbid you from protecting yourself. And there's no liability on their part if they fail to protect you. Sort of looks like you're out of luck, doesn't it?
Has this issue been beaten to death on these boards or is anyone still interested in talking about this last term of the Supreme Court?
-bear
|
Bear, I have carefully read you post more than once just to make sure I'm not missing your intention. We are allowed to protect ourselves and our property, so who do you claim is forbidding it? A protection order is a legal document only, that ensures penalties for violating the order. It was never intended to guarantee 24/7 protection by law enforcement.
As an aside, my step-daughter from hell got a restraining order, then chose to ignore it by bringing the bastard back into her life. A good man died for that. Would you hold the police responsible?