Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ustwo
I see, so you are saying employing a reservist should be a burden on the employer?
Think about it and the implications.
|
For state or city jobs I don't see a problem with it. Thats what it is in this case.
And the reservist is already a burden on the employer, they're not exactly working while they're out shooting people on the other side of the planet.
Same goes for the thousands of other folks over there now and the businesses they're taken from. I don't think it should be law for regular businesses, the war already has them taking an employment hit. But for city/state/federal jobs, yes i think it should be law. The individual has shifted from an every day government job to one where they are running a major risk of getting killed, they should atleast make what they made at their other government job. To pay them less is an insult.