|
willravel, you are right, there should be more openess - especially about important events like these - if anything, keeping things hidden or attempting to hold back information is a policy that will often backfire, since people are usually able to see through lies etc.
Now, I've just watched the video linked, these are the points it raises.
1) Pentagon hole too small for 757 and the suggestion that may have been a missile.
I agree that the hole looks smaller than I might expect, but then, I'm not sure what to expect. The impacts on the WTC saw the plane entering the building in its entirity, not leaving any parts around either.
2) WTC controlled collapse/detonation
I think it's perfectly reasonable to prime skyscrapers for detonation, so as to avoid dangerous toppling scenarios. No conspiracy there.
3) WTC plane not a commercial liner
This is something I'm not convinced about - some eye-witnesses (out of hundreds, if not thousands) say it was a non-commercial flight - many others may disagree - there's just no real evidence either way - including the footage available. Further, and I'm not sure how to corroborate this, I remember friends of mine mentioning that they had seen the flights on their flight-paths via internet air-traffic-control information sites - these sites may have the information showing the flightpaths on that day - but it shows that either the air-traffic people were fooled too, or that they are in on it as well, or that they were commercial flights, hijacked by terrorists.
4) WTC plane with attached pod
I don't know about the pod - not much I can say about it.
5) Mysterious flashes at point or just prior to point of impact
I don't understand the big deal made about these - I'd pass it off as static charge - Same as you can get when you step out of your car after a long journey. No big deal.
|