View Single Post
Old 06-16-2005, 12:36 PM   #2 (permalink)
RangerDick
Loser
 
Location: manhattan
Quote:
Originally Posted by host
Why are they discrediting sentiment in favor of an impeachment investigation against Bush for launching an illegal war in Iraq that is now a disaster, and lying about the threat to the U.S. that Saddam alledgedly posed, in 2002?
You're question is fatally flawed in that it is dependant on outright false assumptions. That said, I'll attempt to answer anyway. There are 2 reasons.....

1. There is/was nothing illegal about the war in Iraq. Repeating it over and over does not make it any truer.
2. The "Bush lied" meme is quite old and worn out. Repeating it over and over does not make it any truer. I repeat, repeating it over and over does not make it any truer.



There are already a million threads about these topics.

Quote:
Originally Posted by host
why is the NY Times helping to discourage a proper reaction to all of the evidence?
By "proper reaction" I suspect that you mean "reaction that host wants to see". If the NYT isn't trying to lynch Bushco on a particular topic, it's a safe bet to say that there ain't much there.
RangerDick is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73