I'm quite surpised at the amount of negative opinion being formed about him. Yeah, he's weird, very weird, but he loves kids (don't twist that sentence) - why does that make him a child molester? I really don't see it. You are shouting blue murder at the verdict. Sure, there's a bit of smoke. Sleeping with kids in your bed is smoke in the eyes of the anti-paedophile-crazed media and world that we are now in, but that does not mean he did anything to them that was sexual.
From
http://www.australianparentsformegan...ocs/whatis.tpl: Definition of a Paedophile:
Quote:
|
"The Macquarie Dictionary defines paedophilia as "sexual attraction in an adult towards children". The Concise Oxford Dictionary defines the word as: "sexual love directed towards children".
|
Keyword: "Sexual". MJ has always admitted that he slept with kids, but has always maintained it is non-sexual. Now can we please trust the jury and justice system and accept the verdict. Not guilty. Give the guy a break? So he's a bit weird, let him be weird in his own way - he's not hurting anyone. That has just been decided by the jury.