To be fair, Scott Peterson wasn't a celebrity until America became googley eyed with his dead pregnant wife. So, I can kind of see where Ng is coming from.
Martha Stewart wasn't convicted solely on her wealth, she was convicted because she's a woman in a powerful position. Other fuckers, just as guilty have yet to serve any jail time because they're sans vagina.
All that being said....
I really don't care that Jackson was found not-guilty. On the one hand, if there's smoke, and there's been a whole lot of smoke, don't you think?, then there's got to be a fire somewhere. I mean, there was the almost court case a couple of years ago, the more recent fiasco and, as I understand it, several kids/parents he's paid off over the years. So, are all of them lying? Have we really been hounding this guy that much for nothing? Probably not. If it walks like a duck, talks like a duck..it must be a pedophile.
On the other hand, these folks that had him brought to trial were probably trying to milk the 'King of Pop' for a little bit of money. The stories just didn't seem to add up not to mention the history (if I understand it correctly) of the family doing this kind of shit before.
So, is he guilty? Probably not in this instance. He's definately got some problems, though, no doubt about that.
__________________
No signature. None. Seriously.
|