It's comical to see people already disgusted that he was foudn not guilty. The jury had a lot more evidence than any of us did, and 12 people just decided that there wasn't enough evidence to prove that he did it. What makes your emotional reaction based on sensationalistic news reports intended to boost ratings any more credible than those of 12 people who agreed unanimously that he was not guilty based on 14 weeks of a trial?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Redlemon
I'm just stopping in here to note that the verdict is due to be released, so I wanted to preserve the current standings before people vote knowing the verdict:
Let's see how good the wisdom of the crowd can be...
|
Poll frozen at quoted results.