Originally Posted by host

The debate here should be whether the president, the VP, and the cabinet launched a war of aggression against a sovereign nation for reasons that they knew at the time to be provocations that were intended to fix the "facts" to fit the policy of a premeditated invasion, instead of actual justification of an imminent threat to national security.

Why can't or won't you debate the pressing issue of whether we have an executive administration of bumbling incompetents or war criminals?

That seems more alarming than your attempt to distract the discussion from the slow motion reaction to this controversy, by the American people.