Quote:
Originally Posted by lurkette
I'm so very tired of the publicity surrounding this case. I don't think he's particularly talented - he writes trite pop that, while catchy, isn't particularly interesting. His biggest selling point is that he was a child star who turned into a popular singer (and excellent dancer, gotta admit) who then got to be famous for just being a freak. I don't care whether he is guilty or not, frankly. I don't see any reason for this to be so widely covered - it's just another legal case in a sea of legal cases that have no bearing on my life or anyone else's who's not involved. I have to roll my eyes when I see on MSNBC.com that they'll break into broadcasts when the verdict is read. It's not like it's the Rodney King verdict. Sheesh.
|
You summed it up sooo well. Why should we give him MORE publicity if he is guilty of this. If not - why should we give publicity to the parents and child who , in that case, falsely accused him? I'm not sure what to think. Apparently there's enough evidence against him to have a case. Yet I've heard of things that make me question the character of the accusing parents. At this point I just really don't care.
__________________
"Always learn the rules so that you can break them properly." Dalai Lama
My Karma just ran over your Dogma.