View Single Post
Old 06-09-2005, 06:02 AM   #1 (permalink)
Mephisto2
Junkie
 
Did someone say "Backflip"?...

erm...

I mean "About time! Bravo!"

Quote:
Bush may reconsider Guantanamo
June 9, 2005 - 7:44AM

US President George Bush said today he was ready to examine alternatives to the US camp for "war on terror" detainees at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, but defended the treatment of prisoners there.

Asked in a US television interview whether the camp should be shut down, he said: "We're exploring all alternatives as to how best to do the main objective, which is to protect America. What we don't want to do is let somebody out that comes back and harms us."

The United States has faced international criticism of the detention centre at its naval base in Cuba since it was opened in early 2002 to house alleged Taliban and Al-Qaeda militants. There are about 540 inmates from 40 countries there.

Controversy has risen in recent weeks over allegations about the abuse of Muslim holy books there and former president Jimmy Carter on Tuesday joined US politicians who have called for Guantanamo's closure.

US Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld said yesterday, during a trip to Norway, that the United States was not considering closing Guantanamo.

Mr Bush and Mr Rumsfeld insisted prisoners at the camp were treated humanely.

The President told Fox News television: "I first of all want to assure the American people that these prisoners are being treated in accordance with the Geneva Convention.

"I say in accordance with, because these weren't normal military-type fighters. They had no uniforms. They had no government structure.

"These were terrorists, swept up off the battlefield in a place like Afghanistan, for example. And it's in our nation's interest that we learn a lot about those people that are still in detention, because we're still trying to find out how to better protect our country."

He insisted that all allegations of abuse were investigated. He reaffirmed his comment that an Amnesty International report likening Guantanamo to a "gulag" was "absurd".

AFP
REF: http://www.smh.com.au/news/World/Bus...123927281.html

Not withstanding my tongue-in-cheek thread title, I'm glad to see the inklings of common sense appear in the US Administration's position with regards to Guantanamo Bay.

On the flip side, I'm still disappointed at their frantic obsession on the use of the term "gulag" by Amnesty International. If they want to get pedantic about things, then I'm sure we can bring up some examples of other unfortunate phrases used in the past four years.

Mr Mephisto

Last edited by Mephisto2; 06-09-2005 at 06:05 AM..
Mephisto2 is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360