i confess i haven't read this whole thread... so this is written in response to original post only.
i think when you speak about social operation being the holy grail for a societal system... you subtly steer the topic on a specific course where not all the premises are agreed upon (or even brought to the table).
what is the goal of civilization? when you make social order the primary key, it is easy to forget that social justice is by some (myself included) preferred over order.
it appears the discussion has been framed by "how much control produces the best social operation?" while i would begin it with "how much control is just?". the two are not necessarily identical.
__________________
If you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not too costly, you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance for survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves.
~ Winston Churchill
|