pan6467

I would love to hear a reason why the wording is ok. So far all excuses are debunked and this is not a Lib. circle jerk thread.... I am honestly calling all the supporters of the Rights "war on legislating judges" and asking why you can support this but Schiavo's case was rightfully ok to fight.

I am not trying to say you are hate mongers, I am trying to very honestly ask why this is ok and so far all I get is:

As for the nude part I already covered that in the very post you quote.........


Again I did cover "this Bush Bashing" in the very post you quote and posts before it........ However again it seems that another Righty would rather this be about Bush bashing then answer the question...... or grasp at the "nude" part and believe that is the reason for this to be ok.

BTW, Limbaugh, O'Reilly and so on NEVER NEVER bring Clinton or Kennedy or any Dems name up in issues totally unrelated to them???? I guess it is ok for them but not for me?

Again, I have been to my share of Wiccan events, worships, celebrations, parties and so on and I have yet to see any nudity .

So to argue that nudity is commonplace is not true nor based on any foundations other than some quick searches and a sentence in the article saying that SOME Wiccans practice in the nude.

It's the same as basing a judgement on Christianity by saying "they handle snakes" or "speak in tongues" or "judge others with prejudice even though Christ preached love and understanding, tolerence and NOT to judge anyone." But the judge phrased his/her ruling "The parents shall not expose their child to non-mainstream Christian beliefs." with no other rationale or reasoning explicit in the ruling.

Would that be ok?????? It's the same thing? I have a feeling like I stated before..... the Religious Right and GOP would be calling for the judge's head, getting 24/7 media coverage and doing all they could to get that ruling changed.

What's the revisionist history..... where is it in this thread??????? If you can prove ANYTHING I have said wrong then I'll accept your criticism of me.... otherwise you are personally attacking me fraudulently and with malice because you cannot reasonably argue the topic of this thread.... but instead choose to rehash this "Bush bashing" and this "us against them" mentality that would allow this ruling to set a precedent and affect other parents the right to teach their children whatever religion they so desire.

You want so much to discredit or tear down this thread because the Right has yet to come up with one solid argument as to why this is ok ..... or to disprove the hypocrasies that Schiavo's case was "ok to hound judges about legislating from the bench" however this judge legislating from the bench is OK and right on..........

You Righties are even showing that you only read in this thread what you want and not the whole thing .... or even the article for that matter.

Which is it judges can't legislate from the bench or they can??????
Which is ok for you Righties?
Or are there "circumstances where it is ok for a judge and not ok for a judge to make new laws with prejudice?"

Which is it........ it's ok to worship how the Religious Right and the government allows or does the 1st Amendment give the blanket that it was meant to and NO GOVERNMENT BRANCH (LOCAL, STATE OR FEDERAL) HAS THE RIGHT TO PASS LEGISLATION ON WORSHIP???????

I thought the Right was supposed to be "the guardians of Democracy and the Bill Of Rights" and yet NOT 1 ON HERE CAN TRULY DEFEND THIS JUDGE'S RULING EXCEPT TO

- insinuate Wicca as a cult,
- a fringe religion that people change like socks,
- compare Wicca to Heavens Gate
- then the press article itself was challenged
- Use the "Bush/GOP bashing" excuse as the sole reason for this thread.
- and yet a third who seems to want to use the "nudity" issue even though it has been shown where the father says he doesn't practice in the nude already.... in the articles and in posts.

And yet still silence on why this judge can make laws from the bench but Schiavo's judges were and all these other judges that do are a disgrace and need to be replaced.

Why do you not answer the questions I pose but instead resort to "Bush bashing" excuses and attacks on me?

__________________
I just love people who use the excuse "I use/do this because I LOVE the feeling/joy/happiness it brings me" and expect you to be ok with that as you watch them destroy their life blindly following. My response is, "I like to put forks in an eletrical socket, just LOVE that feeling, can't ever get enough of it, so will you let me put this copper fork in that electric socket?"