Quote:
|
Originally Posted by host
alansmithee, are you accusing me, because of the content of my posts, of aiding and abetting an enemy of the United States, i.e., committing treason by questioning the acts of members of the federal executive branch who conduct themselves in an unprecedentedly secretive manner, as if they are unaccountable to the elected representatives of the people, and above the law? The president's press secretary said this:
|
For one, I wouldn't be accusing you any more I would accuse a printing press or paperboy. You don't have anything but links, with at most one line of original content that may or may not have to do with the topic at hand.
And who's opinion is it that this administration is "unprecedenedly" secretive? I see no proof of this. During wartime, many previous administrations have opperated in greater levels of "secrecy". Just because there isn't a live webfeed into the White House and Pentagon at all times doesn't equate to "unprecedented secrecy". And the executive branch isn't accountable to Congress, it's a separate entity.
And these people aren't "questioning", they are rabble-rousing. They are actively trying to hurt the administration, and they have no consideration for who they take out in the process. It goes back to the hatred liberals have for Bush, they lose all reason in their blind persecution of him and anything/anyone attached to him. They figure if they can't get him out in an election, they will try to harm the country to damage how people see him. They advocate for terrorists, murderers, and thugs rather than give any ground. And I think much of what they do is treasonous.