Quote:
|
Originally Posted by host
What prompts you to make a blanket statement about what society currently "considers harmful"? At most, there is conflicting opinion from the scientific community.
|
Seriously, is it necessary to challenge everything just because you don't agree with it? Despite numerous laws regulating just how nudity can be presented to children, are you seriously going to try to say theres just "conflicting opinion"? It's funny, that I knew by saying society there would be someone who would jump all over that one word, and just ignore everything else.
Quote:
|
I am not going to argue if exposing children to nudity is harmful, I'll just provide some opinion from an NIH study, leading psychologists, and from a 1997 medical journal:
|
If you weren't going to argue it, why did you bother posting? Just to show your mastery of google.com? And also, if that's the best you can do for support, you have failed. What qualifies the 3 individuals actually quoted in your articles as "leading" psychologists? I'm glad you had the time to research their credentials in the approx. 40 minutes between our posts to determine that they are, indeed, leading psychologists. In the link you posted, the psychologists identified as "leading" felt that nudity in the home WAS damaging to children. And in your article from '97, there was nothing talking about the potential psychological side effects about nudity being exposed to children, it was dealing with a microscopic jellyfish being trapped in clothing. And it doesn't even identify the "medical" journal that said that swimming nude would prevent the rash from the jellyfish. It even states that in the original source DIDN'T mention swimming nude as a prevention method.
So what was the purpose? You commented nothing about the original thread, or what I had to say about the original thread.