The article pretty well elaborates the implications of a dead GW. The labelling of "unpatriotic" to anyone less than sobbing their eyes out, the strengthening of both our own and foreign powers' resolve, and all the rest of it. I think it's a pretty fair guess on pretty much all accounts. However...
Quote:
|
Liberalism has to be more than a college fad or a collection of loudmouths whose idiotic comments stir headlines. The rabid dislike some people feel for a man they've never even met makes me ashamed to be a Democrat.
|
...I fail to see how this "democrat" sees idiotic comments coming only from "liberals", or that they're "a collection of loudmouths", any more than any outspoken "conservative" or group of conservatives are. Also, i'm curious what the point of the whole article really is... it really does nothing more than allow the writer to hypothesize what a Bush-free world would look like, regardless of whether it's optimistic or not. I really don't gather much from the article that suggests any useful intent.