But you are ignoring our entire system of government and how it is structured.
First, you are talking about state judges that are probably elected locally.
Second, the framers of the constitution were very specific in how they seperated the branches.
So even if the Indiana state government was overwhelmingly Republican, it would have no real bearing on what judges (the judicial) was doing. They could attempt to pass a law which the judges would be required to follow, but then such a law itself would be open to judicial review.
Third, Bush is NOT the head of the GOP, the GOP National Party Chairman is the head of the GOP.
Forth, there is a real separation between state level politics and national level politics.
So I hope you can at least see why some people feel you are unfairly bashing Bush in your post.
__________________
"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their own conscience." – C. S. Lewis
The ONLY sponsors we have are YOU!
Please Donate!
|