Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Mephisto
No, because cloning is artificial creation of life. The argument goes that cloning is "unnatural" as it is Man creating life, which is deemed to be the right only of God. At least that's the simplistic description of the religious objection.
Once again, all these are natural, whilst human cloning is not.
Mr Mephisto
|
Mephisto, what would the position be on artificial insemination, or fertility drugs to help women conceive a child? How about storing a man's sperm for use at a later date? Medicine has been responsible for creating life in a "unnatural" manner for quite a while, with organ transplants and vaccinations - why is it that this medical breakthrough is playing God in any greater way?