Quote:
Originally Posted by Lebell
As to the case at hand, regardless of my personal feelings and experiences with wiccans, I fully support their rights to raise their children as they see fit and I think these judges were way over the line and need to be censured.
|
I do too, all I want to know is are we getting all the facts or is there more in the report then has been released.
Its very easy for the press to fuck up a story, misslead, and missrepresent. I am wondering was it truely a case of religious intolerance, or was there more to it. We are only getting one side here as stated
Quote:
"The federal government has given Wiccans protection under the First Amendment," Snyder said. "Unless this judge has some very specific information about activities involving the child that are harmful, the law is not on his side."
|
Since the judge isn't allowed to speak about the case, we have to take the parents word. I'd like to know more before I get my panties in a bunch. If the judge is basing this over personal opinion only it should be overturned faster than a 9th Circus court ruling.