View Single Post
Old 05-28-2005, 02:13 PM   #70 (permalink)
raveneye
Born Against
 
raveneye's Avatar
 
Quote:
I didn't think the issue was with private vs. government funding. I was under the assumption that the main issue was with the United States government limiting through the legislation the ability to even work with stem cells by choking off access to stem cell lines.
My understanding is that the debate does to a certain extent involve funding: Bush is opposed to using federal funds to support any stem cell research that involves destroying an embryo. That seems to be his position. He seems OK with the idea of doing the research in principle, as long as federal funds are not used for the destruction of embryos. He stated in his recent speech that stem cell research on previously destroyed embryos is ethical.

The difficulty is that the 78 U.S. stem cell lines that Bush approved for research (because they were made from previously destroyed embryos) were found to be tainted, so they can't be used. So at present we're at a dead end; embryos need to be destroyed in order to create new stem cell lines, but Bush won't allow federal funds to be used for this purpose. Presumably private funds could be used, but at present there isn't any private support (as far as I know -- anybody know of private sources funding stem cell research?).

Then the House voted to ease restrictions of federal funding, which would allow new stem cell lines to be created. Bush is adamant though and has promised to veto the bill.

And into this mix a Korean lab just demonstrated that stem cells can be created by cloning: you take the DNA out of any somatic cell, take an egg cell and remove its DNA and replace it with the somatic cell DNA, induce it to divide, and it can be made to form a blastocyst. So you've created stem cells in vitro, without creating a zygote by fusion of egg and sperm.

Is this cloned blastocyst a real embryo? Well, if you implant it in a womb, it will develop into a baby. But there was no "conception" involved, its DNA was from a skin cell or bone marrow cell or some other somatic cell, not from a sperm or egg. It has no potential to develop into a human because it's sitting in a test tube. So what is it? Bush hasn't weighed in yet on whether he thinks this is a disposable "embryo" or not.

That's where we stand. Other countries are full speed ahead on this research; we're basically sitting waiting.
raveneye is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360