View Single Post
Old 05-23-2005, 12:23 PM   #71 (permalink)
Willravel
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phage
I am not saying that someone who kills is insane, obviously there are some instances where a sane person would consider the risks or penalties for murder worth it. My point is that if they did not know it was wrong/against the law we would at least give them a lesser charge. Someone who is otherwise mentally stable but had no concept of right or wrong might be considered a sociopath, a form of mental sickness. The distinction is not that people who kill are insane, but that not knowing that killing was against the law/wrong would indicate insanity.
There is a difference between a sane person considering murder in a fantasy and an unstable person planing murder, so let's get that out of the way. I suppose we all have let our baser nature get the best of us when we considered running that jerk in the Miata off the road for cutting you off. That is different than buying knives and rope in preperation for killing the guy in the Miata after following him home. Can both know what they are doing is wrong? Of course. Are they both sane because they know it's wrong? Nope. You do not have to be sociopathic in order to be found legally insane. I would argue that the second person is insane. Like I said before, I would argue that anyone who has ever cvommitted murder outside of self defence or accident is mentally and socially deficient in some way.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phage
I wonder how much you can really "take back" any form of punishment. Obviously a fine is easy to refund but what about imprisonment? I don't know of any way to give people back their time.
It's less 'taking back' and more 'allowing to reenter society and go on living'.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phage
Another thing to consider is if the worst you can do to someone is life imprisonment it puts anyone who has been convicted of such a crime into a very dangerous position. Once a person had committed such a crime once they would have absolutely no reason not to kill again; what more are you going to do to them?
If one has been given a life sentence, the only people he/she can murder are prison guards and staff, and other prisoners. A life term of solitary confinement without the possibility of parole would rule out further murders. I cannot morally justify the death penalty, so I am against it. If you have different morals, you're decision might be different. To each their own.
Willravel is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360