I don't see how anyone reading the Post's article could conclude that the information presented to the public and Tillman's family was accidentally incorrect.
From that article, it certainly appears as though there were no differing reports--the witnesses knew what they did, attempted to cover it up, and the leadership kept the information to itself.
If someone reached an alternate reading from that article, I'd appreciate an explanation of how you did so.
__________________
"The theory of a free press is that truth will emerge from free discussion, not that it will be presented perfectly and instantly in any one account." -- Walter Lippmann
"You measure democracy by the freedom it gives its dissidents, not the freedom it gives its assimilated conformists." -- Abbie Hoffman
|