05-12-2005, 09:18 AM
|
#18 (permalink)
|
Banned
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by roachboy
......... no doubt, this kind of density of information would prompt many tv viewers to wander away from their screens to get sandwiches or something and thereby miss vital advertising. better to keep information short and punchy, to reduce the sense of linkage to information to the most base imaginable level (paranoia works--it prevents folk from wandering away to get sandwiches, thereby missing vital advertising)--even if the cost of this short/punchy model is no understanding whatsoever of the american modes of "managing" the planet that the neocons obviously see as a vast american colony--no idea of why folk in other places might have views of the states that cannot be jammed into the dynamic paranoia/cheerleading that seems to shape most tv coverage of the planet--what matters is not what you know of the world, what you know of the american role in the world, but that you do not wander away from the tv to get a sandwich or something and thereby miss vital advertising................
...........why dont "they" like us? could you bring me a beer, martha? vital advertising is coming.
|
ABC news is actually surrendering to make way for what yoiu speak of........
Quote:
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/TheNote/story?id=156238
The Note: The New Abnormal
Free Sound and Pictures
The Note
By MARK HALPERIN, MARC AMBINDER, LISA TODOROVICH, DAVID CHALIAN, SARAH BAKER, and KELLEY PREMO
WASHINGTON, May 12
NEWS SUMMARY
Brides gotta run, planes gotta stray, and cable news networks gotta find a way to fill a lot of programming hours as cheaply as possible. (CNBC gets to talk about the booming April retail sales numbers, and the NRA's television network will replay the Secretary of State on Larry King over and over.)
We say with all the genuine apolitical and non-partisan human concern that we can muster that the death and carnage in Iraq is truly staggering.
And/but we are sort of resigned to the Notion that it simply isn't going to break through to American news organizations, or, for the most part, Americans.
Democrats are so thoroughly spooked by John Kerry's loss —- and Republicans so inspired by their stay-the-course Commander in Chief —- that what is hands down the biggest story every day in the world will get almost no coverage. No conflict at home = no coverage..................
|
roachboy, can you bring me another beer?
Quote:
http://blogs.salon.com/0004024/
Wednesday, May 11, 2005
Dear George,
Once again hot tears of orgiastic joy chill my cheeks. I just finished reading the Pentagon’s The National Defense Strategy of the United States, another grandiose wet dream from your delicious Neocons.
I was barely able to see the print when I read, “Our role in the world depends upon effectively projecting and sustaining our forces in distant environments where adversaries may seek to deny us access.”
What compression! We are going to occupy a country so they can’t keep us from occupying their country. Under this policy we will no longer tolerate being denied access anywhere! And the finesse, George, I love the finesse of it all. They’ll be no massed armies storming a country. <h4>Instead we’ll just drop tiny bases here and there whose sole purpose is to act as a staging area should trouble erupt in a country because we have a base there.</h4>
How cleverly this conceals our hidden agenda of eternal and ongoing warfare. Each of these “tiny” bases in an antigen to the country in which it is placed. And like all good antigens it’s only a matter of time before it triggers the antibody of insurrection, thus giving us an excuse to trash the country. This is exactly what happened in Saudi Arabia when Osama took exception to placing our troops in Saudi Arabia. Look at the benefits! We’ve been able to kick ass Afghanistan and Iraq. The possibilities for future conflicts are endless. The military-complex is good to go for generations to come.
Sometimes I am amazed that your brain doesn’t explode from the sheer force of its brilliance. Keep those policy wonks in the Pentagon working overtime.
Your admirer,
Belacqua Jones
|
|
|
|