Quote:
|
Originally Posted by uncle_el
quentin richardson wasn't helping the clippers to win a ton of games. should we use the same analogyy that was used in nash's case and say the clippers finished with a better record this year without richardson, so richardson obviously isn't a factor?!?!?
|
What do the CLIPPERS have to do with anything? The clippers are better this year, therefore Nash is MVP? What in the world?
Oh, and for you people saying they were the same team minus Nash a year and two years ago, wake up. Amare is leaps and bounds better than he was in the past, plus he stayed healthy. Adding someone like Q who adds 15 points a game is a definite factor, plus Joe Johnson stepped up his game bigtime, since he could now play in his natural position.
Besides, neither of these guy's teams are going to win the championship. One word: Repeat.