View Single Post
Old 05-06-2005, 02:51 PM   #23 (permalink)
alansmithee
Junkie
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by kutulu
What special privledges are you referring to? The special priviledge of protection from being fired because of your sexual orientation or the special privledge of being given the same rights that straight couples enjoy? The Rush take is bogus crap.
What rights do straight couples have that gays don't?

Quote:
The only double standard is from the man who tried to pass laws that would allow people to fire gays for no other reason than they are gay but he secretly engages in the same activities. Hypocrite?
Not at all. If he thinks that homosexuality is something that employers should be able to fire someone over, that's his opinion. Just because it isn't in his best interest doesn't inherently make him hypocritical.

Quote:
The funniest thing is that when the gay person is a Republican, they rush to his support. Where are they when gay couples demand equal treatment?
Again, I fail to see where gays aren't equally treated. Many people disapprove of their actions, but that is their right. Maybe the gay mafia should quit trying to force their morality on the rest of the public.

Quote:
I hope this continues. Republiqueers who beat their chests about morality and sancitiy of marriage (in a legal, not spiritual sense) but secretly bone men need to be exposed for the cowardly traitors they are.
What if they simply see marriage for what it is-a legal binding between a man and a woman, and don't think the government and businesses should support deviance.

And by your logic of labelling these people traitors, anyone who is American and comments negitively on America's practices is also a traitor.

Quote:
I don't expect every gay person to be a gay rights activist. Go ahead and align yourself with the party of homophobic thugs if you wish and keep your real self in the closet. However, if you are going to support bills that seek to limit gay rights you need to be exposed.
If you are a dem/liberal (which I am assuming) your hypocracy is staggering. Essentially, you are saying that someone's private life has a bearing on how they do their job. And you are also saying that gays should be forcefully exposed if they don't follow the democratic line, or if they try to think for themselves. I'm glad you aligned yourself with a party of hypocritic, amoral, deviants.
alansmithee is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360