Your all over the place superbelt. Was she raped because she's too young to give consent, and as such should have the abortion? Is it because it is a "factual detriment to her health", and as such she should have the abortion? Or is it because she has a "right to choice" to top it all off?
You admittedly don't know anything about the situation, but suggest it's rape because she is incapable of choosing to have sex at 13, but suggest at 13 she's capable of choosing to have an abortion. And the only "factual detriment to her health" is her current behavior. If i'm wrong about that, please throw some facts my way.
I'm seriously trying to understand your position, and would like to know what for you is the determining factor. Is it her physical health (by all means throw some detrimental facts my way, maybe i'll think differently)? Mental health? Or my hunch, the need to protect a womans right to choose at any and all costs (i.e. - are you really considering this 13 year olds situation and what's best for her, or is your position knee-jerk reaction to someone preventing an abortion, any abortion)
|