View Single Post
Old 05-04-2005, 05:05 AM   #51 (permalink)
raveneye
Born Against
 
raveneye's Avatar
 
As far as federal judges are concerned, if they are so liberal then why did the GOP this year transfer class action lawsuits from the state to federal courts? The sponsors apparently believe that federal judges will be more sympathetic to business interests and less sympathetic to consumer activists.

And that's no surprise, since Republicans have controlled the White House for 24 of the last 36 years, and most of the federal judiciary was nominated by Republican presidents.

If we define "judicial activism" in operational terms, namely any attempt to stack the courts with justices who appear to match your political ideology, then it seems clear that Republicans have been much more successful in this pursuit than Democrats.

Here are the pertinent stats:

--Ninety-four of the 162 active judges now on the U.S. Court of Appeals were chosen by Republican presidents.

--On 10 of the 13 circuit courts, Republican appointees have a clear majority.

--Since 1976, at least seven of the nine seats on the U.S. Supreme Court have been filled by Republican appointees.

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/htm..._judges18.html


Here are the circuit courts:

Code:
Circuit  Where          Dem      Rep    Bush nominees

D.C.	Washington 	4	5	3
1st	Boston	2	4	
2nd	New York	7	6	
3rd	Philadelphia	6	7	
4th	Richmond	4	9	2
5th	New Orleans	4	11	1
6th	Cincinnati	6	6	4
7th	Chicago	3	8	
8th	St. Louis	2	9	
9th	San Francisco	16	8	1
10th	Denver	5	7	
11th	Atlanta	5	7  	1  
Federal	Washington 	4	8
http://www.independentjudiciary.com/

Quote:
Who appointed current judges

Nixon: 1
Ford: 1
Carter: 9
Reagan: 29
G.H.W. Bush: 29
Clinton: 59
G.W. Bush: 34

Total: 162
raveneye is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73