View Single Post
Old 04-28-2005, 07:10 PM   #72 (permalink)
Tophat665
Minion of the scaléd ones
 
Tophat665's Avatar
 
Location: Northeast Jesusland
Quote:
Originally Posted by StrangeFamous
people also have a right to be protected from offensive speech
Sorry, no. People have a right to be offended by offensive speech, but and they may be able to exclude it from certain places as a matter of privacy, but they have no right to be protected from it. And let me pick that bone too: how can you be protected from speech? What damage can speech do you? Seriously, if one does not believe in onesself, I suppose, then speech which reinforces their peceived shortcomings might put them in a frame of mind as to damage themselves, but that's not a problem of speech, that's mental illness there.

But let us return to protection from offensive speech. Surely it is no mystery that any arbitrary word might be offensive to anyone. To a man with no feet, would anythig but the metric system be offensive? (Is black coffee offensive? Obviously to someone. That sounds like the kind of person to follow at a discrete distance until they leave a lousy tip so you can accurately call them a niggard and watch their feathers really ruffle for no reason.) Is it offensie to the woman who has had to have a radical mastecomy if somenone say that they "just have to get something off their chest" in their presence. I've been there, and I felt a little weird when that came out of my mouth, but just forged ahead because reasonable people do not take common turns of phrase like that personally even if they have a serious negative association with their literal meaning. (and because, having already stuck my little toe in my mouth, figured it would be a good idea not to keep going until I had the foot up to the knee.)

And I am not going to argue mankind/humankind. I have found that folks who are worried about that have already made up their minds. Whehr or not they have a good reason is not something I think it is important to fight about, but I do reserve the right to think they're being profundly superfical, reading as much into linguistic theory as the Victorians did into evolution, and more than a little silly.

So to recap: Your right to not be offended is not a right that trumps free expression in a public forum. Private is, of course, private. And if you want to not use man in the general rather than the gendered sense, that's your right, but I find it a little offensive.

Be Well, oh Famously Strange one.
__________________
Light a man a fire, and he will be warm while it burns.
Set a man on fire, and he will be warm for the rest of his life.
Tophat665 is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360