View Single Post
Old 04-27-2005, 09:11 AM   #126 (permalink)
cellophanedeity
Heliotrope
 
cellophanedeity's Avatar
 
Location: A warm room
Here's what I get out of all of this:

ID shouldn't be taught in biology classes, but I see little harm in mentioning "The Christian faith believes this, but in this biology class we will be discussing Darwin's evolution. If you wish to discuss the relationships between these two ideas, please talk to me, or if there is great enough demand then we will discuss in class."

I think the main problem with this is that we have the thought that we cannot discuss both. Yes, they are in opposition to one annother, and yes one has more scientific background. But what I believe is that if we are discussing "The beginning of the earth" then we should present common conceptions of how the Ball got rolling.

I completely disagree with teaching Creationism as The Truth, which is what I suppose is being proposed by the US government (?) but I see no harm in presenting it as an idea.

I first heard of ID in my grade nine biology class. My teacher was a creationist, but he still taught us evolution, because he believed that both could work in tandem. I can't support his ideas here, but I can say that this did happen. I then learned more details about ID in my grade eleven philosophy class, while discussing Aquinas, and have recently discussed it again in my History of Western Philosophy class in university.

The problem with arguing back and forth between Creationism and Evolution, is that both have their limits. Both suggest that something happened that "started" whatever it is that we are doing now. Neither is comfortable with the idea of infinite regression, but one is slightly more comfortable with it than the other. The thing is that science relies on Microbes (which we have concrete evidence of existing, but we have no definite explaination of how got here) whereas Creationism relies on "god" for comfort.

What I find most interesting about the argument is that ID doesn't nescitate the Christian God, and yet it is mostly Christians that fall back upon this.

Oh, and just for info, I'm a deist who believes that evolution and creationism can coincide. I don't believe in the Christian god, but I do feel that the universe probably had a Starting Force, which I guess I choose to call "god."
__________________
who am I to refuse the universe?
-Leonard Cohen, Beautiful Losers
cellophanedeity is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360