Quote:
Originally Posted by alansmithee
Again, the assumption that the people Bush appointed were less qualified. What if the Republicans were as qualified, or more qualified?
|
I don't assume they were less qualified, I just assume we are pulling from a smaller pool. If you are looking for the best minds and you exclude half the total pool on something other than intellect or ability, chances are you're not going to get all the best.
Quote:
Originally Posted by alansmithee
I accept it because there's no other option. If there was a viable option to the Republican/conservative side, I would select it. It has nothing to do with being afraid or uninterested in positive change. Neither party is interested in positive change. Don't think that Dems don't pull this kind of power play. As I said, this is a non-issue, the only reason it appeared here was in another tired attempt to show how supposedly bad the Bush admin is.
|
Please, I beg you, STOP MAKING THIS ABOUT DEMOCRAT VERSUS REPUBLICAN. I don't care if the Democrats would do this, I don't care that this makes Bush bad, I want it to stop. I don't believe there's no other option, and that you DO believe it is holding you back. You are only seeing things in black and white, or, in this case, Democrat or Republican. It's okay to have your own political views that don't necessarily line up with either of the two major parties, or with any party.