Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lockjaw
Hmmm...
Working under the premise of things are between two consenting individuals...
I'm getting the vibe from some of you that...
Men should have vesectomies but women should not have to have their tubes tied if they don't want kids.
Men should be "men" and wear condoms if they don't want kids but women shouldn't be responible and MAKE their partner wear a condom if they want to have intercourse.
|
No, both parties are equally responsible for birth control, if being child free is that important to you and you need to have sex don't place all the faith in preventing pregnancy in the hands of someone else. Also, realize that every method of birth control (even vasectomies and tubal ligations) have been known to fail. Everybody knows someone who had an unplanned pregnancy after one of those procedures took place.
Quote:
|
Are any of you taking yourselves seriously when you are saying "be a man and take better care of what you are doing...if you aren't willing to pay you aren't mature enough to be having sex...." However when this exact SAME arguement is stated as to why women should have no right to abortion when her desire is based upon it not "ruining" her life it's roundly yelled down as being sexist.
|
I'm 100% serious on that. It is the woman's body and abortions are not pretty or mentally easy. I'm sure that most pro-choice people (like myself) are in favor of having that option available for those who want it but could never personally do it. You can't fault someone for not doing what most people couldn't do themselves.
Does anybody actually think
society will be better if we make it ok for men to run around impregnating women freely and then be completely free of any financial obligations?