View Single Post
Old 04-20-2005, 09:22 AM   #5 (permalink)
OFKU0
Junk
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by CandleInTheDark
Quebec should go on a majority vote, yes. However it should only go if a vast majority of the people voted. If 90% of the population of Quebec votes 51% yes, then let it go.

My concern is what do we let go? The whole province? A hundred kilometer strip along the St. Lawrence? The northern tip?
Well this is the problem. How does one divvy up the province between those who want sovereignty and those who don't. And who decides? Aside from impending civil war if succession were to occur, what happens to the aboriginal voice, their land as well as self government? And how much will Quebec still receive from Canada monetarily wise if such a split were to occur?

I recall Stephane Dion as Interprovincial Affairs minister (or something like that) say Quebec would be supported until they got their feet firmly planted on the ground if succession were to occur. How long does that take? 1 year? 20 years? The point being, regardless as to wanting Quebec to seperate or not, the friends with benefits tag wouldn't go over well with the rest of the country.,..."No sir,we do not want to be part of Canada but still want to be supported by it." And I don't want to work for my employer anymore but still want to get paid. Not likely.

In a lot of ways, Quebec is already a country onto it's own but without the title of being a sovereign state. Quebec receives millions into the billions for retaining and protecting it's culture. The French language (francophone entity) is supported, endorsed and promoted throughout Canada by the Official Bilingualism Act. Quebec has the right to two tiered healthcare unlike any other province, yet another broken promise of Paul Martin. Jean Charest wants to and is included on international economic trade junkets in support of Quebec and recently, was the only premier to attend the Pope's funeral.

I'm not for seperation but for equality. Equality for all provinces and people. That's what Canada should stand for. At times I have to wonder if Quebec politicians (Bloc) and their supporters really understand how fortunate they are not only that their wanton needs are almost always met unconditionally, but how the rest of Canada is so allowing and complacent to the notion that they are given a voice in the House of Commons even thought the intention to seperate is loud and clear.Only in Canada I say!!!
__________________
" In Canada, you can tell the most blatant lie in a calm voice, and people will believe you over someone who's a little passionate about the truth." David Warren, Western Standard.
OFKU0 is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360