i don't see any reasonable defense of the prosecution. regardless of if they have chosen to push boundaries, thei man is entitled to fair treatment by the law.
there's no "i don't like your attitude" exemption to the 14th ammendment, or any of the other due process statutes. Art...i respect your knowledge of the situation, but it really does sound like you're making a defense of repression here. you don't ask why those are the boundaries, and why a governement might chose to prosecute people who chose to do this as art. those aren't givens. governments don't have to react like this...the art is, by statement, intended to raise questions about food saftey. Why would a government prosecute people who resist the commerical/industrial narrative of how food ought to be grown? Why would a government get involved in any of this?
__________________
For God so loved creation, that God sent God's only Son that whosoever believed should not perish, but have everlasting life.
-John 3:16
|