View Single Post
Old 04-16-2005, 08:31 AM   #7 (permalink)
roachboy
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
i read through the article at the beginning of this thread and found to total lack of detail concerning the trials of dr jean cobb to be interesting. why is the explanation offered in the article--that all this happened because she was a republican--compelling if there is no detail offered?

how did it come about that the sequence of cliche floated in rightwingland about academic cultures, such as they are--you know, the pc nonsense, the endless redbaiting, the whining about the persecution of conservatives--have amounted to a set of assumptions about academic institutions that are accurate at all, much less that can function as adequate premises for evaluating particular situations to the exclusion of actual information about actual cases?

more broadly:
what exactly is the motive behind the conservative assaults on university-level education?
what do they hope to gain?
a country of absolute political monotony where no questions concerning the obvious problems that run from end to end of conservative ideology can be formulated?
do they want to extend the politically-motivated intellecutal and political handicapping of children, carried out in church basements and/or conservative homeschooling now, into universities?
is the assumption that if you cant make your ideology coherent, you can counter the problem by eliminating spaces where problems are raised and discussed?

of all the various elements of conservative ideology that tend toward the authoritarian, few are more obvious than the conservative loathing of dissent.
maybe it is the case that for the american right, democracy can be understood as many people talking--the question of whether they are all saying the same thing is secondary to seeing alot of people talking. that these people have no pwoer, can influence nothing is secondary to hearing the same thing coming from all quarters. all dissent is heresy.

this aspect of conservative ideology seems to me far more like the ideological component of stalinism than anything the right isolates about "the left" : dissent in america seems to the right to be what the "hitlero-trotskyite wrecker" was for stalin--an empty floating signifier that offered a pseudo-explanation for problems with the existing order, an enemy against which hyterical bile is directed, a signifier that justifies any and all types of repression?
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite
roachboy is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360