I voted "something in-between"
Now, before people get on my ass, let me explain:
It was, at least, assault. But, it was not neccessarilly sexual assault, I believe most of you are jumping to that conclusion, assuming that it was a case of latent homosexuality being mixed with aggression. It really could have had nothing to do with sex. It could have simply one guy, trying to gain dominance over another. No, that doesn't make it any better, but it does not make it sexual. I believe that most of you are assuming it's sexual because it involves two males and a rectum.
It could very well have been sexual assault, but that will be up to the court to decide, most likely through a psychiatric evaluation. I'm just saying, don't jump to conclusions.
__________________
Apathy: The best outlook this side of I don't give a damn.
|