View Single Post
Old 04-09-2005, 04:59 PM   #11 (permalink)
jorgelito
All important elusive independent swing voter...
 
jorgelito's Avatar
 
Location: People's Republic of KKKalifornia
So does anyone have a handle on our (US) healthcare industry? I want to get a clear picture (as possible) so maybe we can have a meaningful debate. Seems to be alot of information and misinformation.

Here's what I know or think I know (Please add or correct the info as necessary).

1. US pays the most for health care (our govt.) - versus other countries
2. Doctors say they aren't getting paid enough
3. Patients say costs are too high
4. Certain lobbyists complain malpractice insurance is too high
5. Certain lobbyists say we are too litigious (But are we really?) which drives up insurance.
6. Hospitals complain of staff shortage
7. Others complain of too much labor

So, which is it? These "facts" seem to contradict each other

What are the real factors driving up costs? Is it litigation? DO detractors not think litigation is warranted? Where's the accountability then?

From personal expreience, I believe there is definitely major, major staff shortage. I could never understand this (I live in California where there is an acute nurse and staff shortage)

If doctors complain they're not getting paid enough and patients complain costs are too high, then where is the equilibrium? Or is the "middleman" to blame (insurance companies).

Are the insurance companies really not making enough profit like they're always crying about? I don't kow, but I suspect it to be like oil companies: You'll always make a profit, just depends how much is enough I suppose...

One thing's for certain, NO ONE (doctors, patients, nurses, hospitals, govt., people) is happy with the current situation except maybe the insurance companies who I am not convinced are losing money.

Another thing's for certain: Costs will definitely increase as someone noted before, as the baby boomers get older and start "paying" for their unhealthy lifestyles (obesity up for example, etc) or rather, we start paying for their unhealthy lifestyles. Preventative care MUST be part of a solution, I don't think anyone group can bear the costs of reactive care. It doesn't seem to make economic sense.

I think this is an unavoidable issue that needs to be addressed.

Can any one crunch the numbers or can add or dispute what I am saying? What d'y'all think?

*EDIT* I don't mean to come off as anti-insurance industry: My opinion is based on second-hand info and anecdotal evidence.

It would be really great if someone who works in health insurance could lend some perspective to this discussion and help clear the air.

Last edited by jorgelito; 04-09-2005 at 05:02 PM..
jorgelito is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360