Quote:
Originally Posted by Manx
If the answer is no to both of these questions, I cannot wrap my head around WHY this legislation could possibly be considered a good thing. It essentially says that fighting is better than avoidance. Every rational person knows that is nonsense.
|
It's being done to remove any question about the legality of such actions. In some jurisdictions, if you shoot and kill an attacker who has shot you in the chest and is currently raping the bullethole, you're going to STILL face trial for some form of homicide, even though the odds of conviction are tiny.